Published by Todd Davies on 18 Dec 2007
Compliance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Revised Guidelines
The ASX Corporate Governance Council has been at pains to emphasise to the market that the framework is not a “one size fits all” approach to corporate governance, but a model against which companies can assess their current practices and assess whether they need to move forward. In simple terms, the principles work on the basis that is okay not to adopt a recommendation, as long as sufficient disclosure is made to enable investors to assess whether the company has an alternative mechanism which addresses the spirit of the principles, or alternatively is deliberately taking a strategy of non-compliance. The theory is investors will make their own mind up.
So what does all this mean? Well three things really:
- Great governance should be common sense
- Great governance shouldn’t be difficult to implement
- You shouldn’t have to spend large sums of money on compling or writing disclosure statements.
Our offering is really simple and is aimed at small and mid-cap companies:
- We’ll tell you quickly whether you comply already - and make sure you get credit for what’s already in place
- In the areas where you don’t comply, we’ll see if you already have mechanisms which address the spirit of the principles - again making sure you get credit for being a well governed organisation
- If you don’t comply and don’t have a good mechanism, we’ll give you guidance on whether this matters to your company, to the market and what easy and quick solutions are available to you.
- In rare cases when the answer isn’t a simple one, we’ll give you the answers straight and steer you to a cost effective path.
There are many quick wins in this area, and we’ll make sure you’re across them.
Why TDA?
Todd Davies has been a practitioner representative on the ASX Corporate Governance Council since shortly after the first principles and recommendations were released and was a member of the working group on Principle 7 (Recognise and Manage Risk). He has deliberately positioned himself as a pragmatist on the group with a sense of how to make the principles useful in practice, and practical to implement.
Perhaps more importantly, Todd believes that this should be an area which common sense prevails and not one where consultants generate large fees. We encourage you to hold us to that!
